Sanity in the FCP X Debacle

The Final Rewrite by Michael Habernig

Final Cut Pro is important. It’s important in my life, perhaps in yours, and in many people I know. I get why people are freaking out. I do get it. Apple has made some serious mistakes here. But this isn’t a post about what’s missing out of FCP X, or what’s wrong with it, or why it’s useless to you. I think that the discussion over FCP X online and in the circles of people I talk to has gotten, well, ridiculous.

I do not understand how anyone could be under the impression that Final Cut Pro 7 was going to be replaced on June 21st. If anything, the supermeet was a forewarning by Apple saying, “this is coming, it’s going to be different, but we think this is the way to build a foundation for the next-generation of non-linar editing.” And that’s exactly what FCP X is, a foundation. Hell, the underlying architecture is called AV Foundation.

The inner workings of FCP 7 are based on decisions made made in the 90s. What made–and still makes–Final Cut Pro 7 amazing is the powerful features and ecosystem that surrounds that core; XML, OMF, EDL, APIs to interface with capture and output cards, flexibility… I could go on.

Over the past three nights, I’ve spent about a total of 20 hours in FCP X. I jumped head-first with a client project I began cutting in FCP 7, not a decision I normally make on a project but it just so happens I have a little time to spare between now and the deadline. It is DSLR-shot product demos and talking heads. Seemed perfect to get my hands dirty with FCP X. read more...


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.


You may also like

View all
Example blog post
Example blog post
Example blog post